08-14-2014, 01:30 AM
I agree. Perhaps I should have phrased my statement more clearly.
There are probably are more amateurs here on the forum, and on the customer lists. To me, the real question is not IF there are more amateurs or not, but is the app focused on supporting them?
Will emerging advanced features be geared for use in paid, live performances -- or for studying and learning new things ABOUT the music being studied?
And I'm fine with keeping the main app focused on performing artists. I would just like to speak up for what I suspect is now a majority of users, to please consider creating a 'study' version for those of us still climbing (however slowly!) the learning curve. And I would consider synchronized audio tracks to be a major step in that direction.
There are probably are more amateurs here on the forum, and on the customer lists. To me, the real question is not IF there are more amateurs or not, but is the app focused on supporting them?
Will emerging advanced features be geared for use in paid, live performances -- or for studying and learning new things ABOUT the music being studied?
And I'm fine with keeping the main app focused on performing artists. I would just like to speak up for what I suspect is now a majority of users, to please consider creating a 'study' version for those of us still climbing (however slowly!) the learning curve. And I would consider synchronized audio tracks to be a major step in that direction.