08-03-2024, 05:25 AM
So, likely this should fall under "goofy user query about a peculiar feature," but ...
It would be convenient (but not really any more important than that) for me to be able to sort a setlist based on the SONG_ID rather than the TITLE. I don't see how to do that. Is it possible?
While I'm at it (
), an apparent nit to pick on the "Select Sort Method" UI that arose as I was experimenting with selecting the sort method ...
What triggers the sort to happen is clicking one of the radio buttons (A-Z, Shuffle, Manual, etc.). But if you just want to switch either from or to "Ascending" by checking that box, it doesn't trigger the re-sorting -- you then have to click one of the radio buttons, even if it's the one that is currently selected (and perhaps just clicked before proceeding below to select or deselect "Ascending").
I can understand why/how this occurs (and the coding logic behind it), but selecting/deselecting "Ascending" should itself throw an exception that will trigger the resorting as a radio button does: if all I want to do is to change is the order, I shouldn't have to take the unnatural and unexpected step of clicking on an already selected radio button for the type of sort. (An easy way out for coding would be to have two radio buttons -- for "Ascending" and "Descending", which also makes things more explicit.)
The "Select Sort Method" dialog is also a bit odd in that you can't cancel out of it: the only way out is to select (or re-select) one of the methods, and this isn't immediately obvious to the user.
It would be convenient (but not really any more important than that) for me to be able to sort a setlist based on the SONG_ID rather than the TITLE. I don't see how to do that. Is it possible?
While I'm at it (
), an apparent nit to pick on the "Select Sort Method" UI that arose as I was experimenting with selecting the sort method ...What triggers the sort to happen is clicking one of the radio buttons (A-Z, Shuffle, Manual, etc.). But if you just want to switch either from or to "Ascending" by checking that box, it doesn't trigger the re-sorting -- you then have to click one of the radio buttons, even if it's the one that is currently selected (and perhaps just clicked before proceeding below to select or deselect "Ascending").
I can understand why/how this occurs (and the coding logic behind it), but selecting/deselecting "Ascending" should itself throw an exception that will trigger the resorting as a radio button does: if all I want to do is to change is the order, I shouldn't have to take the unnatural and unexpected step of clicking on an already selected radio button for the type of sort. (An easy way out for coding would be to have two radio buttons -- for "Ascending" and "Descending", which also makes things more explicit.)
The "Select Sort Method" dialog is also a bit odd in that you can't cancel out of it: the only way out is to select (or re-select) one of the methods, and this isn't immediately obvious to the user.
------------------
Gary H. Merrill
Gary H. Merrill