Mike,
Thanks a lot for your help, and I appreciate all of the considerations you need to take when making changes.
It seems that your suggestion for using fixed duration scroll is the best solution:
Pause duration 0
scroll speed fixed duration 3 seconds
Time before scrolling starts 0
Applied to all songs in setlist
Set as default
(then ok)
I did "set as default" and forgot to apply to all songs in setlist.
I use the right pedal to start automatic scrolling and use left pedal to scroll to top of page.
So far this is a good solution AND it solves one problem from the old program. Previously, moving backwards sometimes jumped back a page and rarely was that necessary. So stopping at the top of the page is very logical. (I move backwards to check a key signature or instrument change and all of that is always on the same page.)
So let me say, that this solution is even better than the old program. I will add a post about some small finer points of the wording of the menu, which confused me earlier, but that is small compared to this.
Thanks again!
Thanks a lot for your help, and I appreciate all of the considerations you need to take when making changes.
It seems that your suggestion for using fixed duration scroll is the best solution:
Pause duration 0
scroll speed fixed duration 3 seconds
Time before scrolling starts 0
Applied to all songs in setlist
Set as default
(then ok)
I did "set as default" and forgot to apply to all songs in setlist.
I use the right pedal to start automatic scrolling and use left pedal to scroll to top of page.
So far this is a good solution AND it solves one problem from the old program. Previously, moving backwards sometimes jumped back a page and rarely was that necessary. So stopping at the top of the page is very logical. (I move backwards to check a key signature or instrument change and all of that is always on the same page.)
So let me say, that this solution is even better than the old program. I will add a post about some small finer points of the wording of the menu, which confused me earlier, but that is small compared to this.
Thanks again!